Abstract
Gauss gave a well-known proof that under certain conditions the postulate that the arithmetic mean of a number of measures is the most probable estimate of the true value, given the observations, implies the normal law of error. I found recently that in an important practical case the mean is the most probable value, although the normal law does not hold. I suggested an explanation of the apparent discrepancy, but it does not seem to be the true one in the case under consideration.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
