Abstract

The calculation of rocket trajectories is most often performed using purely numerical methods that account for all relevant parameters and provide the required results. There is a complementary need for analytical methods that make more explicit the effect of the various rocket and atmospheric parameters of the trajectory and can be used as test cases with unlimited accuracy. The available analytical methods take into account (i) variable rocket mass due to propellant consumption. The present paper includes four new analytical methods taking into account besides (i) also (ii) nonlinear aerodynamic forces proportional to the square of the velocity and (iii) exponential dependence of the mass density with altitude for an isothermal atmospheric layer. The four new methods can be used in “hybrid analytical-numerical” approach in which: (i) the atmosphere is divided into isothermal rather than homogeneous layers for greater physical fidelity; and (ii) in each layer, an exact analytical solution of the equations of motion with greater mathematical accuracy than a numerical approximation is used. This should allow a more accurate calculation of rocket trajectories while discretizing the atmosphere into a smaller number of layers. The paper therefore concentrates on four analytical methods of calculation of rocket trajectories in an isothermal atmospheric layers using new exact solutions of the equations of motion beyond those currently available in the literature. The four methods are developed first for the simpler case of a vertical climb and will be subsequently extended to the practically more relevant case of a gravity turn.

Highlights

  • Four new methods of analytical calculation of rocket trajectories are presented

  • The present paper aims at including the continuous dependence of aerodynamic forces on altitude through the mass density, and chooses as a starting point the dynamical trajectory equations (Section 2), using an earth-fixed Cartesian frame (Section 2.3) rather than the orthogonal frame moving along the trajectory (Section 2.1); in the latter case, altitude can be eliminated (Section 2.2) by introducing the radius of the curvature of the trajectory

  • The four methods I to IV of calculation of rocket trajectories have been applied to a single isothermal atmospheric layer, and use “analytical” solutions of the equations of motion; their accuracy would be improved by dividing the atmosphere into layers as is currently done in the “numerical”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Four new methods of analytical calculation of rocket trajectories are presented. The analytical methods have at least three advantages. Using the moving frame (b) and taking as variables the velocity and flight path angle, the acceleration components along and across the flight path are nonlinear; in this case, it is straightforward to eliminate time from the trajectory by dividing the longitudinal by the transversal acceleration, leading to a single differential equation for the path This method was originally applied [6] to calculate the ballistic trajectory of a projectile of constant mass in a uniform gravity field, with drag proportional to a power of the velocity and opposite to it; the extension of this solution to include the effects of thrust and variable mass has been researched extensively [7,8]. The case of free flight without thrust post burnout is considered by a fourth method IV, extending the known solution for constant atmospheric mass density [3], to exponential variation of altitude; this method leads to a series expansion with the terms of all orders calculated explicitly (Section 5.3)

Dynamical Equations of the Rocket Trajectory
Orthogonal Frame Moving with the Velocity
Influence of the Lift-to-Drag Ratio
Fixed Cartesian Frame with Axis Along Altitude
Trajectory Calculation via a Power Series of Time
Atmospheric Mass Density as a Function of the Mass of Burned Propellant
Leading Coefficients of Power Series Expansion
Alternative Methods for Short Times or Long Times
Residual Mass Fractions as Time Variable
Atmospheric Mass Density as a Function of Residual Mass
Determination of Exponent and Coefficients of the Series Solution
Methods
Three Distinct Methods of Trajectory Calculation
Comparison of Accuracy for Short Times and Long Times
Direct Calculation of the Taylor Series Expansion
Peak Altitude in Post Burnout Flight
Computation of a Powered Followed by a Ballistic Ascent
Input Data for Trajectory Calculation
Altitude and Ascent Velocity in Powered Flight
Method
Peak Altitude in Unpowered Ballistic Flight
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.