Abstract

Lovász (1987) proved that every matching covered graph $G$ may be uniquely decomposed into a list of bricks (nonbipartite) and braces (bipartite); we let $b(G)$ denote the number of bricks. An edge $e$ is removable if $G-e$ is also matching covered; furthermore, $e$ is $b$-invariant if $b(G-e)=1$, and $e$ is quasi-$b$-invariant if $b(G-e)=2$. (Each edge of the Petersen graph is quasi-$b$-invariant.)
 A brick $G$ is near-bipartite if it has a pair of edges $\{e,f\}$ so that $G-e-f$ is matching covered and bipartite; such a pair $\{e,f\}$ is a removable doubleton. (Each of $K_4$ and the triangular prism $\overline{C_6}$ has three removable doubletons.) Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty (2002) proved a conjecture of Lovász which states that every brick, distinct from $K_4$, $\overline{C_6}$ and the Petersen graph, has a $b$-invariant edge.
 A cubic graph is essentially $4$-edge-connected if it is $2$-edge-connected and if its only $3$-cuts are the trivial ones; it is well-known that each such graph is either a brick or a brace; we provide a graph-theoretical proof of this fact.
 We prove that if $G$ is any essentially $4$-edge-connected cubic brick then its edge-set may be partitioned into three (possibly empty) sets: (i) edges that participate in a removable doubleton, (ii) $b$-invariant edges, and (iii) quasi-$b$-invariant edges; our Main Theorem states that if $G$ has two adjacent quasi-$b$-invariant edges, say $e_1$ and $e_2$, then either $G$ is the Petersen graph or the (near-bipartite) Cubeplex graph, or otherwise, each edge of $G$ (distinct from $e_1$ and $e_2$) is $b$-invariant. As a corollary, we deduce that each essentially $4$-edge-connected cubic non-near-bipartite brick $G$, distinct from the Petersen graph, has at least $|V(G)|$ $b$-invariant edges.

Highlights

  • We prove that if G is any essentially 4-edge-connected cubic brick its edgeset may be partitioned into three sets: (i) edges that participate in a removable doubleton, (ii) b-invariant edges, and (iii) quasi-b-invariant edges; our Main Theorem states that if G has two adjacent quasi-b-invariant edges, say e1 and e2, either G is the Petersen graph or the Cubeplex graph, or otherwise, each edge of G is b-invariant

  • Tutte [26] proved his celebrated 1-factor Theorem characterizing matchable graphs, and deduced as a corollary that in a 2-edge-connected cubic graph each edge lies in a perfect matching

  • The triangular prism C6 has a nontrivial 3-cut C, and for each e ∈ C, the edge e is neither removable nor does it participate in a removable doubleton

Read more

Summary

Matching covered graphs

Tutte [26] proved his celebrated 1-factor Theorem characterizing matchable graphs, and deduced as a corollary that in a 2-edge-connected cubic graph each edge lies in a perfect matching. For distinct vertices u and v of G, it is deduced from Tutte’s Theorem that the graph G − u − v is matchable if and only if no barrier of G contains both u and v. An edge e of G is admissible if there is some perfect matching of G that contains e; otherwise it is inadmissible. An edge e is admissible if and only if no barrier of G contains both ends of e. A connected graph with two or more vertices is matching covered if each of its edges is admissible. A cubic graph is matching covered if and only if it is 2-edge-connected

Tight cut decompositions
Edges of an essentially 4-edge-connected cubic brick
Organization and summary of this paper
Cubic graphs and tight cuts
Removability
Matchable subgraphs
Bricks of order 10
Pfaffian graphs and conformal minors
Proof of the Main Theorem
The barriers B1 and B2
Bricks isomorphic to K4
The Cubeplex
The Petersen graph
Consequences of the Main Theorem
An infinite family of cubic bricks

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.