Abstract
The assumption of gaussian distribution of relaxation times adopted by Hill and Ichiki for the explanation of experimental data on frequency dependence of dielectric constants ε of TGS and DKDP is examined. It is known that the above assumption is inadequate since it fails to predict the critical slowing down around the phase transition temperature. It is shown analytically that the above assumption is not suitable for the explanation of ε in high frequency region. An alternative distribution function of relaxation times is shown.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
