Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the analytical and numerical convexity analysis of discrete delta Riemann–Liouville fractional differences. In the analytical part of this paper, we give a new formula for the discrete delta Riemann-Liouville fractional difference as an alternative definition. We establish a formula for the Delta ^{2}, which will be useful to obtain the convexity results. We examine the correlation between the positivity of ({}^{mathrm{RL}}_{w_{0}}Delta ^{alpha} mathrm{f} )( mathrm{t}) and convexity of the function. In view of the basic lemmas, we define two decreasing subsets of (2,3), mathscr{H}_{mathrm{k},epsilon} and mathscr{M}_{mathrm{k},epsilon}. The decrease of these sets allows us to obtain the relationship between the negative lower bound of ({}^{mathrm{RL}}_{w_{0}}Delta ^{alpha} mathrm{f} )( mathrm{t}) and convexity of the function on a finite time set mathrm{N}_{w_{0}}^{mathrm{P}}:={w_{0}, w_{0}+1, w_{0}+2,dots , mathrm{P}} for some mathrm{P}in mathrm{N}_{w_{0}}:={w_{0}, w_{0}+1, w_{0}+2,dots }. The numerical part of the paper is dedicated to examinin the validity of the sets mathscr{H}_{mathrm{k},epsilon} and mathscr{M}_{mathrm{k},epsilon} for different values of k and ϵ. For this reason, we illustrate the domain of solutions via several figures explaining the validity of the main theorem.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.