Abstract

Abstract. Many dynamical models, such as numerical weather prediction and climate models, contain so called closure parameters. These parameters usually appear in physical parameterizations of sub-grid scale processes, and they act as "tuning handles" of the models. Currently, the values of these parameters are specified mostly manually, but the increasing complexity of the models calls for more algorithmic ways to perform the tuning. Traditionally, parameters of dynamical systems are estimated by directly comparing the model simulations to observed data using, for instance, a least squares approach. However, if the models are chaotic, the classical approach can be ineffective, since small errors in the initial conditions can lead to large, unpredictable deviations from the observations. In this paper, we study numerical methods available for estimating closure parameters in chaotic models. We discuss three techniques: off-line likelihood calculations using filtering methods, the state augmentation method, and the approach that utilizes summary statistics from long model simulations. The properties of the methods are studied using a modified version of the Lorenz 95 system, where the effect of fast variables are described using a simple parameterization.

Highlights

  • Many dynamical models in atmospheric sciences contain so called closure parameters

  • The computational grid used in modern climate and numerical weather prediction (NWP) models is too coarse to directly model cloud micro-physics and many cloud-related phenomena are represented by parameterization schemes

  • The state augmentation and the likelihood approaches depend on a data assimilation system, which is often available for NWP systems, but not commonly for climate models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many dynamical models in atmospheric sciences contain so called closure parameters. These parameters are usually connected to processes that occur on smaller and faster scales than the model discretization allows. We discuss different algorithmic ways to estimate the tuning parameters, that is, how to find the optimal closure parameters by fitting the model to available observations. Parameters of dynamical systems are estimated by comparing model simulations to observed data using a measure such as a sum of squared differences between z and y. This corresponds to the assumption that the observations are noisy realizations of the model values. The other two approaches are based on embedding the parameter estimation techniques into dynamical state estimation (data assimilation) methods that constantly update the model state as new observations become available.

Likelihood based on summary statistics
Matching observed and simulated statistics
Fitting a probabilistic model for summary statistics
Likelihood with filtering methods
General formulas
EKF likelihood
Parameter estimation with state augmentation
Description of the experiment
Summary statistics
Likelihood calculations using filtering methods
State augmentation
Applicability to large scale systems
Climatologies with tuned parameters
Conclusions
MAP estimation and Gaussian approximation
MCMC sampling
Importance sampling
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call