Abstract
We consider a distributed server system in which each host processes tasks in First-Come-First-Served order and each task's service demand is known immediately upon task arrival. We consider four task assignment policies commonly proposed for such distributed server systems: Round Robin; Random; Size-Based, in which all tasks within a given size range are assigned to a particular host; and Dynamic-Least-Work-Remaining, in which a task is assigned to the host with the least outstanding work. Using analysis and simulation, we explore the influence of task size variability on which task assignment policy is best. Surprisingly, we find that not one of the above task assignment policies is best. In particular, we find that when the task sizes are not highly variable, the Dynamic policy is preferable. However, when task sizes show the degree of variability more characteristic of empirically measured workloads, the size-based policy is the best choice. We use the resulting observations to argue in favor of a specific size-based policy, SITA-E, that shows very good performance for realistic task size distributions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
