Abstract
Its modest length is deceptive, for this book offers a comprehensive, engaging, and nuanced survey of historical practice in traditional China while eluding the pitfalls common to works with multiple authors. On-cho Ng and Q. Edward Wang draw on recent Chinese, Japanese, and Western secondary scholarship to survey two millennia of historical writing and criticism, starting with the classical period and continuing into the Qing dynasty. Their book is chronologically organized around the major dynastic epochs to highlight the “dominant modes” for each period and the impact of political and cultural developments on historical practice (p. xxii). Similar works in China and Taiwan tend to be written by teams of scholars, creating unevenness in quality. The two-author arrangement here compares well to the better single-authored works in Chinese, such as the trilogy by Du Weiyun. But the authors go beyond mere synthesis to offer fresh insights, such as astutely differentiating European conceptions of “objectivity” from Chinese notions of “straightforwardness” or forthrightness (p. 22). Ng and Wang should also be commended for avoiding the imposition of Western terms and expectations on Chinese historical practice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.