On Bresch's Glossary of Eponyms

Abstract

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article LetterFull AccessOn Bresch's Glossary of EponymsLorenzo Livianos-Aldana, and Antonio Rey-GonzÁlez, Lorenzo Livianos-AldanaSearch for more papers by this author, and Antonio Rey-GonzÁlezSearch for more papers by this author, Valencia, SpainPublished Online:1 Feb 2003AboutSectionsView EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail SIR: Mark Twain famously wrote, “The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated.” Equally exaggerated is David Bresch's claim1 that “no one has ever composed a glossary of psychiatry's numerous eponyms.” After many years of work, in 1999 we published a book on the subject.2 In writing this book we used the principal medical and psychiatric dictionaries in English, French, German, and Spanish, as well as varied bibliographical sources and the main biomedical (MEDLINE, Embase, etc.) and genetic (OMIM) databases. We also traveled to the main Spanish libraries and newspaper archives and ended up visiting the rich Cambridge University Library in England. The methodology we used yielded a total of 811 eponyms, although we did not include some whose use is not yet established. For every eponym, we list a description of the symptom, syndrome, illness, sign, test, or complex; the original reference where it is described for the first time; a brief biography of the author; the synonymy and the eponym's English, French, and German versions; and, finally, bibliographical references to descriptions of the eponym.In view of the above, we feel that Dr. Bresch's work is worthy of praise in that it attempts to recover a tradition that has proven its practical usefulness, but at the same time we believe that its approach is reductionist, dealing with a small number of eponyms in just two or three lines and failing to provide any biographical information on the authors. Another major defect is what Lain Entralgo3 calls an attitude of “Adamism” (the researcher enters a scientific field as Adam would enter Eden: as a place where no man has gone before): the author did not bother to check the statement with which he starts his work, either by consulting the usual bibliographical indices or the well-known ISBN. Needless to say, if one is to do an appropriate job, one must start by being exhaustive in one's use of sources.References1 Bresch D: Beyond Wernicke's: a lexicon of eponyms in psychiatry. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2002; 14:155-160Link, Google Scholar2 Rey González A, Livianos Aldana L: La Psiquiatría y sus nombres: Diccionario de epónimos. Madrid, Editorial Médica Panamericana, 1999Google Scholar3 Lain Entralgo P: Historia de la medicina. Madrid, Editorial Labor, 1999Google Scholar FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited ByNone Volume 15Issue 1 February 2003Pages 117-118 Metrics History Published online 1 February 2003 Published in print 1 February 2003