Abstract

We consider a network revenue management problem and advance its dual formulation. The dual formulation reveals that the (optimal) shadow price of capacity forms a nonnegative martingale. This result is proved under minimal assumptions on network topology and stochastic nature of demand, allowing an arbitrary statistical dependence structure across time and products. Next, we consider a quadratic perturbation of the network revenue management problem and show that a simple (perturbed) bid-price control is optimal for the perturbed problem; and it is $\varepsilon$-optimal for the original network revenue management problem. Finally, we consider a predictable version of this control, where the bid prices used in the current period are last updated in the previous period, and provide an upper bound on its optimality gap in terms of the (quadratic) variation of demand. Using this upper bound we show that there exists a near-optimal such control in the usual case when periods are small compared to the planning horizon provided that either demand or the incremental information arriving during each period is small. We establish the martingale property of the (near) optimal bid prices in both settings. The martingale property can have important implications in practice as it may offer a tool for monitoring the revenue management systems.

Highlights

  • Introduction and summaryThe defining feature of network revenue management is that the products being sold consume the capacities of multiple resources

  • We show that the optimal shadow prices form a martingale

  • We establish that the optimal shadow price of remaining capacity forms a martingale

Read more

Summary

Stochastic Systems

Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://pubsonline.informs.org. The bid prices used (i.e. the optimal shadow prices of capacity) form a martingale, and the resulting booking control is -optimal for the network revenue management problem, cf Propositions 2 and 3. Jasin and Kumar (2013) shows that neither the booking limit nor the bid price interpretation of the deterministic linear program can do as well even with frequent resolving Another important paper related to ours is Kleywegt (2001), where the author considers a stylized (deterministic) fluid model of a general dynamic pricing problem for selling a network of resources. We show that the dual variables corresponding to the primal state variables, i.e. shadow prices of capacity, form a nonnegative martingale To this end, we first introduce a discrete approximation to the network revenue management problem (P) and its dual.

Then note that
Demand constraints are imposed through the set Z where
Then summing this over j gives
Note that
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.