Abstract

A bi-level account of trust is developed and defended, one with relevance in ethics as well as epistemology. The proposed account of trust—on which trusting is modelled within a virtue-theoretic framework as a performance-type with an aim—distinguishes between two distinct levels of trust, apt and convictive, that take us beyond previous assessments of its nature, value, and relationship to risk assessment. While Sosa (A virtue epistemology: apt belief and reflective knowledge, volume I, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009; Judgment and agency, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015; Epistemology, University Press, Princeton, 2017), in particular, has shown how a performance normativity model may be fruitfully applied to belief, my objective is to apply this kind of model in a novel and principled way to trust. I conclude by outlining some of the key advantages of the performance-theoretic bi-level account of trust defended over more traditional univocal proposals.

Highlights

  • A bi-level account of trust is developed and defended, one with relevance in ethics as well as epistemology

  • A helpful—and far, unexplored—way to think about trust will be to draw from the resources of virtue epistemology, and in particular, from the bi-level virtue epistemology framework developed by Ernest Sosa (2009, 2015, 2017)

  • His sophisticated framework for modelling the normative structure of performances with aims will be useful—regardless of what we say about knowledge—for theorising about two very distinctive levels of trust, levels that take us beyond previous assessments of its nature, value and relationship to risk assessment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A bi-level account of trust is developed and defended, one with relevance in ethics as well as epistemology. Sosa’s own view offers a clear and helpful way to model this idea: according to Sosa, we test for an innermost competence with trigger-manifestation conditionals18; we ask, of the individual: would they perform reliably enough if they tried (i) in proper shape and (ii) properly situated?

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call