Abstract
The majority of bonus-malus systems (BMS) determine the premium for each policyholder solely based on their claim frequency. Adopting this method would be unjust. A driver who files a claim for small damage cannot be subjected to the same penalties as a driver responsible for a claim involving significant damage. To achieve a balance in the portfolio between good and bad drivers, a new portion of the premium is computed as a compromise. To do this, the claim severity is created and assessed to provide a fair premium. The consideration was determined by taking into account both the quantity and magnitude of the claims. This work assumes that the frequency of claims follows a Poisson-Akash distribution, but the severity of claims follows a newly proposed distribution known as the Inverse-Gamma Lindley distribution. The bonus-malus premiums were computed using the Bayesian approach for both the frequency and severity of claims. The premium is computed using the asymmetric Linex loss function for both the frequency and severity of claims in the bonus-malus system. Illustrative instances utilizing an actual dataset for the application of BMS are presented, showcasing the use of claim frequency alone and the combination of claim frequency and claim severity. The R software is employed for these demonstrations. We concluded this paper with a discussion comparing the premiums obtained in each case.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.