'On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation'

Abstract

The strong family relationships and different cultural backgrounds of the majority world countries motivate us to conclude that a 'family centred deliberative process' based on accommodation and negotiation is more acceptable, reliable and implementable in these communities. Our suggested model of decision making is more convenient, particularly in cases where competency is compromised by cognitive dysfunction, political or religious restrictions. To insist on absolute autonomy beyond such borders could be counter-productive for both patients and health care personnel. However, the need for further research is paramount, as a deeper understanding of the various cultures and subcultures is essential for developing a more useful structural framework for rehabilitation. The same holds true for the minority world countries, where the diverse and dynamic paradoxes within the 'autonomy paradigm' will ensure its safe application and survival in such communities.