Abstract

Although the research on potential use of nanofluids in automotive vehicles is in its embryonic stage, a number of studies have suggested the strong prospect of nanofluids for the efficient thermal management of automotive vehicles. Nevertheless, the pinnacle of nanofluid-based systems awaits stable nanoparticle suspension. The present work studies the heat transfer performance of an aluminum tube automotive radiator with 31 flattened tubes and louvered fins using water and different concentrations (0.04, 0.08, and 0.12 vol.%)-based SiO2/water nanofluids as the engine coolant. Inlet temperature and flowrate of the fluid were varied from 60 to 70 °C and 12 to 18 LPM, respectively. The topmost increment in heat transfer rate of 36.92% and Nusselt number of 45.53% were observed in the upper range of tested operational parameters, however, the relative heat transfer increment percentage dropped from 5% (between 0.04 and 0.08 vol.%) to 3.5% (between 0.08 and 0.12 vol.%) due to agglomeration and cluster formation caused by the presence of a greater number of nanoparticles. Precise evaluation of the experimental results was also carried out by reperforming the tests after three days of initial experimentations. A mere deviation of less than 1% was observed between the initial and repeated tests, however, the decline was caused due to the synergistic effects of clustering and fouling.

Highlights

  • Nanofluids—being presumed as potential Thermofluids—have been tested in multifarious systems and have evinced exceedingly encouraging results

  • This correlation is applicable for the 2300 − 5 × 106 Reynolds number range and the 0.5–2000 Prandtl number range

  • Experimental precision and convective thermal potential of low concentration SiO2/water nanofluid in an aluminum tube automotive radiator has been evaluated in this experimental study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nanofluids—being presumed as potential Thermofluids—have been tested in multifarious systems and have evinced exceedingly encouraging results. Shah and Ali [1] thoroughly reviewed the use of nanofluids in solar energy applications along with critical analysis of the challenges and practical limitations associated with these systems. Ali et al [4], in another review study, analyzed the preparation of TiO2-based nanofluids for various application systems and discussed the performance deterring factors They underlined pressure drop and sedimentation to be the most crucial challenging factors associated with TiO2 nanofluids. The applications summary (Table 1) highlights the potential aspects of using SiO2-based nanofluids and the most advantageous aspects include minimal pressure drop as compared to rest of the nanofluids, high surge in heat transfer rate, very good dispersion/suspension stability, efficient photothermal conversion, and good thermal and rheological characteristics. Al2O3, Au, Cu, CuO, Fe, TiO2, SiO2, and Diamond Ag, Al2O3, CuO, TiO2, SiO2, and Diamond

Key Findings
Thermal Performance
Uncertainty Analysis
Setup Validation
Prediction Model
Practical Implications
Conclusions and Future Directives
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call