Abstract

Deep learning (DL) is applied to simulate non-adiabatic molecular dynamics of phenanthrene, using the time-dependent density functional based tight binding (TD-DFTB) approach for excited states combined with mixed quantum–classical propagation. Reference calculations rely on Tully’s fewest-switches surface hopping (FSSH) algorithm coupled to TD-DFTB, which provides electronic relaxation dynamics in fair agreement with various available experimental results. Aiming at describing the coupled electron-nuclei dynamics in large molecular systems, we then examine the combination of DL for excited-state potential energy surfaces (PESs) with a simplified trajectory surface hopping propagation based on the Belyaev–Lebedev (BL) scheme. We start to assess the accuracy of the TD-DFTB approach upon comparison of the optical spectrum with experimental and higher-level theoretical results. Using the recently developed SchNetPack (Schütt et al 2019 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15 448–55) for DL applications, we train several models and evaluate their performance in predicting excited-state energies and forces. Then, the main focus is given to the analysis of the electronic population of low-lying excited states computed with the aforementioned methods. We determine the relaxation timescales and compare them with experimental data. Our results show that DL demonstrates its ability to describe the excited-state PESs. When coupled to the simplified BL scheme considered in this study, it provides reliable description of the electronic relaxation in phenanthrene as compared with either the experimental data or the higher-level FSSH/TD-DFTB theoretical results. Furthermore, the DL performance allows high-throughput analysis at a negligible cost.

Highlights

  • Modelling the properties and evolution of large molecular systems is a challenging task in chemical and biological sciences, which usually requires solving the stationary or the time-dependent Schrödinger equation

  • It includes: (i) the validation of the Time-Dependent Density Functional based Tight Binding (TD-DFTB) excited states upon comparison of the computed absorption spectrum versus Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory (TD-DFT), CASPT2 and experimental results; (ii) the application of the SchNet model to learn energies and forces based on the TD-DFTB reference datasets; (iii) the analysis of the results of the Fewest-Switches Surface Hopping (FSSH)/TD-DFTB simulations and their comparison with experimental findings; and (iv) the comparison of the simplified Trajectory Surface Hopping (TSH) simulations based on the Belyaev-Lebedev scheme, with the FSSH/TD-DFTB results, in order to assess the relevance and performance of non-adiabatic dynamics based upon machine-learned Potential Energy Surface (PES) with no a priori knowledge about couplings and conical intersections

  • A detailed theoretical study dedicated to the application of Deep Learning to the non-adiabatic molecular dynamics of neutral phenanthrene, based on TD-DFTB calculations and simplified TSH switching probability has been presented

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Modelling the properties and evolution of large molecular systems is a challenging task in chemical and biological sciences, which usually requires solving the stationary or the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. Machine Learning (ML) has appeared as a promising tool that can be used to fully or partially avoid electronic structure calculations in atomistic simulations.[2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] ML methodologies may differ depending on the objective and can be categorized in three main branches: (i) supervised learning, (ii) unsupervised learning and (iii) reinforcement learning. The supervised Machine Learning models can be used to construct complex interatomic potentials[17, 3] that can in turn be used to perform extensive molecular dynamics simulations.[18, 19, 20] Ideally, this would correspond to an ab initio accuracy at the computational cost of a force field. Several software packages are available for applications of supervised ML to atomistic simulations, e.g. MLatom[28], DeePMD-kit[29] and SchNetPack[1]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call