Abstract

We investigate connections between the geometry of linear subspaces and the convergence of the alternating projection method for linear projections. The aim of this article is twofold: in the first part, we show that even in Euclidean spaces the convergence of the alternating method is not determined by the principal angles between the subspaces involved. In the second part, we investigate the properties of the Oppenheim angle between two linear projections. We discuss, in particular, the question of existence and uniqueness of “consistency projections” in this context.

Highlights

  • The interest in the convergence of sequences of iterates of projections of various types goes back at least to the mid-twentieth century

  • Bargetz et al / Linear Algebra and its Applications 603 (2020) 41–56 can be considered one of the starting points of these investigations. In this article he shows that given a Hilbert space H and two closed subspaces M, N ⊂ H, with corresponding orthogonal projections PM and PN, respectively, the sequence defined by x0 ∈ H

  • Oppenheim introduced in [19] an angle between linear projections in Banach spaces

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The interest in the convergence of sequences of iterates of projections of various types goes back at least to the mid-twentieth century. Bargetz et al / Linear Algebra and its Applications 603 (2020) 41–56 can be considered one of the starting points of these investigations In this article he shows that given a Hilbert space H and two closed subspaces M, N ⊂ H, with corresponding orthogonal projections PM and PN , respectively, the sequence defined by x0 ∈ H x2n+1 = PM x2n and x2n+2 = PN x2n+1 converges in norm to PM∩N x0 for every initial point x0 ∈ H. Oppenheim introduced in [19] an angle between linear projections in Banach spaces This concept was developed further in [20], where a number of sufficient conditions for convergence of iterates of projections are given. We investigate the properties of the Oppenheim angle between two linear projections and provide an example which shows that the modification of the definition of this angle introduced in [20] is necessary

Principal angles
The cross-ratio of projective points
The Oppenheim angle between linear projections
Classification of the convergence behaviour through principal angles
The two-dimensional case
The three-dimensional case: some additional information might be needed
Higher dimensions: angles are not enough
Some remarks on angles between linear projections
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call