Abstract

Switch-reference has recently been argued to be the result of clausal functional heads entering into Agree with two nearby noun phrases, creating pointers to those noun phrases but not actually copying their morphosyntactic features. Instead, the semantic component interprets the pointers as referential dependency holding between pointed-to noun phrases. This article applies this analysis to reflexive voice constructions in which a feature-invariant affix appears on the verb to indicate that the (highest, direct) object is referentially dependent on the (thematic) subject of the same clause. First it surveys the properties that such constructions should have if reflexive voice is maximally like switch-reference. Then it argues that the Bantu language Lubukusu has just such a construction, the verbal affix i partnering with the overt anaphor omweene to create reflexive clauses. Dravidian reflexive voices are presented as another possible case. Finally, it turns to reflexive and reciprocal voice constructions in Shipibo (Panoan), which seem to have a detransitivizing effect. However, no major detransitivizing account fits all the facts. Rather, reflexive voice in Shipibo is like Lubukusu, except that the anaphor is phonologically null and deficient in phi-features, failing to trigger ergative case on the subject for that reason. True detransitivization may happen in some languages with reflexive voice, but not in all, and it will take considerable care to sort out which are which.

Highlights

  • Three topics that are historically intertwined in various ways are reflexivity/anaphora, agreement, and switch-reference (SR)

  • I have argued that an Agree without agreement (A-A) reflexive voice construction is clearly attested in Lubukusu and more tentatively in Kannada, in accordance with the top-down predictions of the SR-inspired Agree-without-agreement framework

  • I have used a closer look at Shipibo to argue that some languages which look superficially like they have valence-reducing reflexive voice (RV) constructions may have A-A RV constructions in which the anaphoric object DP is not very noticeable because of its lack of phonological features and phi-features

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Three topics that are historically intertwined in various ways are reflexivity/anaphora, agreement, and switch-reference (SR). The affix ax in (1a) from the Panoan language Shipibo (spoken in Peru) is one such affix; it contrasts with the different subject (DS) affix tian, used in (1b) where the two subjects are disjoint in reference (Valenzuela 2003; Baker 2014; Baker & Camargo Souza 2020). This opposition forms the core of an SR system.

Key concepts from the study of switch-reference
What an A-A reflexive voice should be like
A-A reflexive voice constructions with overt anaphoric objects
Shipibo reflexives as a less canonical case of A-A reflexive voice
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call