Abstract
Various definitions of consistent interval fuzzy preference relations have been proposed in the literature. This paper aims to review the definitions of additive consistency based on the interval extension of Tanino’s additive-transitivity property. It is demonstrated that some of the definitions are not invariant under permutation of objects in interval fuzzy preference relations and some of them violate the reciprocity of pairwise comparisons of objects, which is not acceptable. Afterwards, two new definitions of consistency, additive consistency and additive weak consistency, based on a proper interval extension of Tanino’s additive-transitivity property are proposed. Both definitions are invariant under permutation of objects and do not violate the additive reciprocity of pairwise comparisons in interval fuzzy preference relations. Further, useful tools for verifying the consistency are given, and some interesting properties of both additively consistent and additively weakly consistent interval fuzzy preference relations are demonstrated. The new definitions of consistency are compared with the reviewed definitions on several illustrative examples and on a real-life decision-making problem.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.