Abstract
We reexamine the original, half‐century‐old, in situ measurements of Simpson and colleagues used to justify the tripole model of charge structure of a thunderstorm that became the paradigm for the charge structure of mature thunderstorms. We find that the original measurements violate the criteria of the tripole model in 49% of the cases. We also reexamine our soundings of electric field in thunderstorms and mesoscale convective systems in the same way as the original soundings were. Our soundings do not fit the tripole model in at least 86% of the storms. Even when we consider only the major features in the electric field profiles, our data show noncompliance with the tripole model in 45% of the cases. We conclude that we must abandon the paradigm of the tripole‐charge structure of thunderstorms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.