Abstract

Many physical phenomena can be modeled by compressible signals, i.e., the signals with rapidly declining sample amplitudes. Although all the samples are usually nonzero, due to practical reasons such signals are attempted to be approximated as sparse ones. Because sparsity of compressible signals cannot be unambiguously determined, a decision about a particular sparse representation is often a result of comparison between a residual error energy of a reconstruction algorithm and some quality measure. The paper explores a relation between mean square error (MSE) of the recovered signal and the residual error. A novel, practical solution that controls the sparse approximation quality using a target MSE value is the result of these considerations. The solution was tested in numerical experiments using orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) algorithm as the signal reconstruction procedure. The obtained results show that the proposed quality metric provides fine control over the approximation process of the compressible signals in the mean sense even though it has not been directly designed for use in compressed sensing methods such as OMP.

Highlights

  • Consider an unknown compressible discrete signal described by a vector x in the CN space, where C denotes the complex number set

  • The obtained results show that the proposed quality metric provides fine control over the approximation process of the compressible signals in the mean sense even though it has not been directly designed for use in compressed sensing methods such as orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP)

  • The solution, which was implemented in OMP method, reduced an overall reconstruction complexity because the given recovery process was interrupted when the target quality level was reached

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Consider an unknown compressible discrete signal described by a vector x in the CN space, where C denotes the complex number set. Many known stopping rules compare the energy of the OGA residual error to some reference level that is based on a scaled value of the system noise power Their definitions can ensure the support recovery, if some additional conditions are met [2,11,17,18], but they are developed on the basis of the strict sparsity assumption. Mathematical formulas that express, both the MSE and an average residual error of a LS-based reconstruction algorithm, in terms of a given sparse approximation are derived using second-order signal properties The link between the MSE and the residual error will be explored in case of use of greedy methods for compressible signal estimation These methods are considered mathematically tractable approximations of the L0-norm solution (e.g., OMP method). The similar relation applies to matrices but the columns are deleted

Sparse Approximation of the Compressible Signal
MSE of the Sparse Approximation
MSE-Based Decision Threshold
Numerical Experiments
Implementation Issues
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call