Abstract

For $\varphi$ a normalized positive definite function on a locally compact abelian group $G$, we consider on the one hand the unitary representation $\pi_\varphi$ associated to $\varphi$ by the GNS construction, on the other hand the probability measure $\mu_\varphi$ on the Pontryagin dual $\hat{G}$ provided by Bochner's theorem. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for the vanishing of 1-cohomology $H^1(G,\pi_\varphi)$ and reduced 1-cohomology $\bar{H}^1(G,\pi_\varphi)$. For example, $\bar{H}^1(G,\pi_\varphi)=0$ if and only if either $Hom(G,\mathbb{C})=0$ or $\mu_\varphi(1_G)=0$, where $1_G$ is the trivial character of $G$.

Highlights

  • The Gel’fand-Naimark-Segal construction provides a correspondence between positive definite functions φ on a locally compactKeywords: continuous 1-cohomology, cyclic representation, GNS construction, locally compact abelian group, positive definite function.Math. classification: 43A35.J

  • Φ is an extreme point in the cone P(G) of positive definite functions on G if and only if πφ is an irreducible representation; or, there exists a constant a > 0 such that φ−a is again positive definite if and only if πφ has nonzero fixed vectors

  • Without relying on the cohomological machinery available in the literature, we achieve by completely elementary means the results of this paper, namely, we show that the existence of nontrivial 1-cohomology is determined by two factors: the existence of non-trivial homomorphisms from G to C and the behavior of μφ near the trivial character 1G

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Gel’fand-Naimark-Segal construction (see [1]) provides a correspondence between positive definite functions φ on a locally compact. Φ is an extreme point in the cone P(G) of positive definite functions on G if and only if πφ is an irreducible representation; or, there exists a constant a > 0 such that φ−a is again positive definite if and only if πφ has nonzero fixed vectors (see [4]) In view of their importance for rigidity questions and Kazhdan’s property (T), it seems natural to try to fit 1-cohomology and reduced 1cohomology of πφ in that dictionary. Without relying on the cohomological machinery available in the literature (see [8, 1]), we achieve by completely elementary means the results of this paper, namely, we show that the existence of nontrivial 1-cohomology is determined by two factors: the existence of non-trivial homomorphisms from G to C and the behavior of μφ near the trivial character 1G This is all delineated in a precise way in Theorem 1.

Statement of results
Proof of Proposition 1
Proof of Theorem 1
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call