Abstract

Drawing on existing theoretical work, as well as field research, this dissertation examines the impact of medical imaging technologies on communication between physicians and older patients when diagnostics often privilege disembodied data over the patient voice. Current diagnostic trends are contextualized within the history of medicine, from Ancient Greece to the present, including the development of imaging. Since the 1970s, advanced medical imaging technologies (e.g., ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging) have become the diagnostic norm in Western medicine. The rapidity of this shift, which renders the human body as flattened data, can outstrip considerations of the implications of applying such technologies to living patients. Focusing on older patients, who may be less technologically savvy than younger patients or medical professionals, the field research begins with semi-structured interviews of patients over age sixty-five, exploring their encounters with medical imaging equipment and professionals. This data is interrogated qualitatively using Foucauldian discourse analysis drawing on Andrea Doucet’s model of slow scholarship, and informed by Arthur Frank’s notion of letting stories breathe; themes were allowed to surface from the patients’ narratives, rather than imposed by the researcher. Information emerging from the data considers patients’ emotions, unexpected physical sensations, communicative strategies and rationalizations, as well as Foucauldian allusions to power. Observational research was also conducted during encounters between physicians and simulated patients in the presence of medical images; these encounters were followed by reflective exit interviews. Research indicates that although physicians are increasingly trained in patient-centred communication, it is not always optimally practised. Physicians are sometimes more comfortable with the medical discourse of disease than with the emotional, metaphoric language of the patient’s illness experience. Since the development of modern Western medicine in Europe of the late 1700s, physicians have been trained to seek pathology, with the increasing aid of medical technologies, rather than listening to their patients. For older patients, who may experience multiple co-morbidities, the lack of communication around advanced medical technologies can increase their sense of vulnerability and anxiety. The dissertation concludes with recommendations for both patients and practitioners to improve communication in the medical context.

Highlights

  • Exploring Imperfections in Medical Communication We look for medicine to be an orderly field of knowledge and procedure

  • This chapter has laid the foundation for the ensuing dissertation by defining the historical roots of both patient-centred and biomedical communication in Ancient Greece; exploring the role of Vesalius and other anatomists in creating an objectified patient body; examining the impact of the professionalization of doctors on their relationship with patients; and ending with an exploration of Foucualt’s concepts of the medical gaze and power relations that inform the remainder of this study

  • Building on Simon Williams’s assertion that, “lay voices should be the final arbiters in these broader theoretical debates concerning the role of medical technology,” the following chapters discuss the methodology and findings of field research examining the impact of medical imaging on patient-practitioner communication (1048)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Exploring Imperfections in Medical Communication We look for medicine to be an orderly field of knowledge and procedure. This dissertation attempts to add to Foucault’s work in the archaeology of medicine, by examining a specific aspect of the complex communicative dynamic between physicians and patients when medical imaging is present. The taxonomies of anatomy and disease derived from this research model have led to a sense that biomedicine is both universal and neutral, a rather myopic perspective that tends to eliminate non-Western or “alternative” medical traditions, as well as dismissing the flesh-and-blood patient in preference for data (Beck 23; Lock 121; Lock and Nguyyen 17; Mishler 15, 196; Worsely 315) While this tightening of focus legitimizes biomedicine as a scientific undertaking, it simultaneously objectifies the living patient, rendering it increasingly difficult for physicians to treat patients holistically or retain a humanistic medical practice. Especially as patients often feel unwell and have low energy, if the interpretation of the disease state is co-produced between the physician and the patient, the power balance can be altered

Conclusion
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call