Abstract
This study was designed to conduct an item analysis of Guglielmino's Self‐Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS) completed by older adults. Specifically, the investigation was designed to determine what, if any, differences might be identified when two methods of completing the SDLRS were used. Accordingly one group (n = 19) of subjects had the scale read to them and they orally indicated their response choice. The other group (n —30) independently completed the scale. Eleven hypotheses were examined. Four of the null forms of the hypotheses were rejected. These findings suggest that (a) the total SDLRS scores for the two groups were not significantly different and that (b) the two groups are not significantly different in terms of education levels or age. Yet interesting variations among the item responses, by group, are identified. The findings reveal differences for responses associated with negatively scored items and a few positively scored ones. According to Cronbach's alpha (α), reliability gene...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
