Old Trees: Extraction, Conservation Can Coexist

Abstract

Because large old trees are essential for forest ecosystem integrity and biodiversity, timber extraction in managed forests should preferentially be concentrated where large old trees are least likely to develop (Global decline in large old trees, D. B. Lindenmayer et al. , Perspectives, 7 December 2012, p. [1305][1]). However, timber extraction and the conservation of large old trees are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Current forest policy and management practices in Flanders, Belgium, aim to convert even-aged stands (areas in which trees are all the same age) to stands with trees of varying ages in an effort to increase forest ecosystem stability and resilience and to allow trees to grow old. As part of their ecologically sustainable forest management, public forest managers have adopted a large-tree retention approach [see also ([ 1 ][2], [ 2 ][3])]. Tree islands within stands managed for production of high-quality timber are reserved for conservation, and trees within these islands will never be extracted. Large old trees of commercially valuable species that have grown beyond the commercially optimal dimensions will not be logged either. And no tree beyond a threshold diameter [currently set at dbh (diameter at breast height) of more than 102 cm] will ever be logged. The strip-shelterwood system (in which trees are cut in linear strips and surrounding trees are given time to grow old) and the coppice-with-standards system (in which some trees are left to grow while others around them are cut) are two examples of forest management that allows the combination of sustainable forest exploitation and conservation of large old trees. ![Figure][4] CREDIT: GRZEGORZ MIKUSINSKI 1. [↵][5] 1. D. B. Lindenmayer, 2. W. F. Laurance , Biol. Conserv. 151, 11 (2012). [OpenUrl][6][CrossRef][7][Web of Science][8] 2. [↵][9] 1. D. B. Lindenmayer 2. et al ., Conserv. Lett. 5, 421 (2012). [OpenUrl][10][CrossRef][11] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1231070 [2]: #ref-1 [3]: #ref-2 [4]: pending:yes [5]: #xref-ref-1-1 View reference 1 in text [6]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DBiol.%2BConserv.%26rft.volume%253D151%26rft.spage%253D11%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1016%252Fj.biocon.2011.10.032%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [7]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.032&link_type=DOI [8]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000306042600004&link_type=ISI [9]: #xref-ref-2-1 View reference 2 in text [10]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DConserv.%2BLett.%26rft.volume%253D5%26rft.spage%253D421%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1111%252Fj.1755-263X.2012.00257.x%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [11]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00257.x&link_type=DOI