Abstract
The well-known 'ruki-rule' found in several IE dialects, whereby s was palatalized in certain environments, is traditionally considered to have been no longer productive in Avestan and Old Persian because s's from sources other than PIE *s were not palatalized. Previous work has been primarily historical, and recent approaches from a synchronic point of view have only tended to confuse synchrony with diachrony. It is shown here that this rule was indeed actively involved in morphophonemic alternation and that its synchronic ordering with respect to other rules has certain implications for the prehistoric developments and the synchronic status of the Old Iranian sibilants. Furthermore, certain of the rules produced surface forms that were in non-automatic alternation, and it is suggested that the apparent exceptions to these rules are of specific types which can be classified along the lines proposed by Kiparsky to elucidate the mechanisms of analogy involved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.