Abstract

The OlympiAD Phase III study (NCT02000622) established the clinical benefits of olaparib tablet monotherapy (300 mg twice daily) over chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer who had received ≤2 chemotherapy lines in the metastatic setting. Here, we report pre-specified analyses of data from Asian (China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan) patients in the study. All patients were randomized 2:1 to olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) or single-agent chemotherapy TPC (21-day cycles of either capecitabine, eribulin or vinorelbine). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. The prevalence of gBRCAm in the OlympiAD Asian subgroup screened for study recruitment was 13.5%. Patient demographics and disease characteristics of the Asian subgroup (87/302 patients) were generally well balanced between treatment arms. Asian patients in the olaparib arm achieved longer median progression-free survival, assessed by blinded independent central review, versus the chemotherapy TPC arm (5.7 vs 4.2 months; HR = 0.53 [95% CI: 0.29–0.97]), which was consistent with findings in the global OlympiAD study population. Findings on secondary efficacy and safety/tolerability outcome measures in Asian patients were also similar to those observed in the global OlympiAD study population. The OlympiAD study was not powered to detect race-related differences between treatment groups; however, the consistency of our findings with the global OlympiAD study population suggests that previously reported findings are generalizable to Asian patients.

Highlights

  • Over the last few decades there has been a dramatic increase in the incidence of breast cancer (BC), the most prevalent cancer in Asian females[1], among Asian populations[2,3]

  • We report pre-specified subgroup analyses to determine the efficacy and safety of olaparib monotherapy versus chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in the Asian (China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan) subpopulation compared with the global OlympiAD study population

  • This blinded independent central review (BICR)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) benefit of olaparib over chemotherapy TPC in the Asian subgroup was consistent with that observed in the global OlympiAD study population (7.0 vs 4.2 months; hazard ratios (HRs) = 0.58 [95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.43–0.80])[9]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the last few decades there has been a dramatic increase in the incidence of breast cancer (BC), the most prevalent cancer in Asian females[1], among Asian populations[2,3]. The predominance of Western patients in some BC clinical trials raises potential concerns over the generalizability of their findings with respect to effective disease management in routine clinical practice to racially diverse populations, including Asian patients[2,4] This is of particular importance because multiple differences exist between Asian and Western patient populations (in their genetic background, socioeconomic status, lifestyle, culture and health beliefs/behaviours) that play www.nature.com/scientificreports an important role in dictating BC incidence and influencing prognosis. Outcome measures evaluated in the OlympiAD trial have not been explored to determine the consistency of the clinical benefits of olaparib monotherapy between the global study population (Europe, North America and South America) and a subgroup of Asian patients. We report pre-specified subgroup analyses to determine the efficacy and safety of olaparib monotherapy versus chemotherapy TPC in the Asian (China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan) subpopulation compared with the global OlympiAD study population

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call