Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated gastric cancer has been identified as a cancer subtype with definitive clinical and molecular characteristics. Although olaparib, a poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, is considered a potential effective agent for gastric cancer, the effect and underlying mechanism of olaparib on gastric cancer depending on EBV infection is not fully understood. EBV-positive SNU719 and EBV-negative SNU638 gastric cancer cell lines were used to identify the effects of olaparib using the trypan blue exclusion method and annexin V staining assay. To observe the underlying cellular signaling mechanisms of olaparib-induced cell death, Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) and signaling related molecule expression were assessed using transfection, silencing of specific genes using small interfering RNA (siRNA), western blotting and signaling inhibition assay. Olaparib decreased the cell viability of EBV-positive SNU719 gastric cancer cells through caspase-3-dependent apoptosis in a dose dependent manner, whereas EBV-negative SNU638 gastric cancer cells showed drug resistance to olaparib. EBNA1 was expressed in SUN719 gastric cancer cells; however, ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) and phosphorylated ATR kinase were expressed in SNU638 gastric cancer cells. EBNA1 transfection decreased ATR phosphorylation through p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation in SUN638 gastric cancer cells, and silencing of ATR kinase increased the susceptibility of these cells to olaparib treatment. Moreover, VE-821, an ATR kinase specific inhibitor, also increased the sensitivity of SNU638 cells to olaparib. In contrast, SB203580, a p38 MAPK inhibitor, inhibited this increase in sensitivity to olaparib by EBNA1 transfection. Olaparib treatment led to different cellular responses depending on EBV infection in gastric cancer cell lines. These results provide new insights into the mechanism of olaparib-induced apoptosis in gastric cancer cells and suggest that EBV infection should be considered when developing new potential therapeutic agents for gastric cancer.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call