Abstract

Foreign direct liability litigation against businesses is still a growing trend in European domestic courts, going on for over two decades.1 With absent effective remedies in host states, victims of human rights abuses committed by transnational corporations’ subsidiaries try to get access to remedy in the courts of the home states of the parent companies. A crucial factor for whether such cases can succeed, is the viability of the claims against the parent companies allegedly involved in the abuses. The principal legal route that victims have used to hold parent companies liable is through common law negligence claims.

Highlights

  • Foreign direct liability litigation against businesses is still a growing trend in European domestic courts, going on for over two decades.[1]

  • The principal legal route that victims have used to hold parent companies liable is through common law negligence claims

  • The court ruled that Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary (SPDC) was liable for damage caused as a result of two oil spills in the Niger Delta, and held that SPDC’s parent company (RDS) owed a limited duty of care to the victims

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Foreign direct liability litigation against businesses is still a growing trend in European domestic courts, going on for over two decades.[1]. A month earlier, the Court of Appeal of The Hague gave its judgement in the case of Four Nigerian Farmers and Stichting Milieudefensie v Shell.[3] The court ruled that Shell’s Nigerian subsidiary (SPDC) was liable for damage caused as a result of two oil spills in the Niger Delta, and held that SPDC’s parent company (RDS) owed a limited duty of care to the victims. This piece discusses these two cases, assesses their contribution to the viability of parent company liability claims, and considers some of the challenges that still remain for claimants

FOREIGN DIRECT LIABILITY AND DUTY OF CARE
Okpabi v Shell
Four Nigerian Farmers and Stichting Milieudefensie v Shell
IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE LITIGATION
Broader Scope of the Duty of Care
Easier Access to Disclosure
REMAINING CHALLENGES
CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call