Abstract
Maritime delimitation is crucial in determining which coastal States may exercise control and jurisdiction over certain hydrocarbon deposits. Although international law has recently become more precise on the matter, boundary disputes are frequently resolved only after several or even many years. Even while coastal States are in a deadlock over delimitation issues, the need to explore and exploit the disputed areas’ resources remains imperative for reasons of energy security, social welfare and economic development. Thus, the question arises as to the rights and obligations of coastal States with respect to the development of natural resources in areas subject to overlapping claims. Against this background, the paper examines the relevant provisions of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, international jurisprudence and State practice. The central argument advanced is that in the absence of an agreed boundary or a provisional cooperative agreement, none of the States concerned operates legitimately in unilaterally undertaking petroleum operations in the disputed area, including seismic surveys, should the conduct of such operations prove to aggravate the dispute. Finally, this paper considers the practical implications of the aforementioned legal position on the development of hydrocarbon resources in areas subject to overlappin g maritime claims. NB: full text available here: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1493219/
Highlights
Introduction to Articles 74(3) and 83(3) of UNCLOS The starting point in any question concerning the legal treatment of offshore petroleum exploration and exploitation activities must be UNCLOS which is the primary regulatory instrument with respect to the international uses of the oceans and the seas
The only provision in UNCLOS that directly applies to the duties of States affected by overlapping maritime claims is paragraph 3 found both in Article 74 concerning delimitation of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and Article 83 concerning delimitation of the continental shelf
Paragraph 3 in both Articles reads as follows: Pending [delimitation]... the States concerned, in a spirit of understanding and cooperation, shall make every effort to enter into provisional arrangements of a practical nature and, during this transitional period, not to jeopardize or hamper the reaching of the final agreement
Summary
Introduction toArticles 74(3) and 83(3) of UNCLOS The starting point in any question concerning the legal treatment of offshore petroleum exploration and exploitation activities must be UNCLOS which is the primary regulatory instrument with respect to the international uses of the oceans and the seas.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
