Abstract

The written OFSTED report is the most enduring outcome of a school inspection. This paper examines the 'fitness for purpose' of such reports, in that the current inspection system carries the motto of 'improvement through inspection'. The value of converting set scales and numerical grades into prose is closely scrutinised, and the less frequent qualitative statements are analysed as examples of educational discourse. The validity and reliability of judgements presented in the reports, produced within two different frameworks and sets of guidance is scrutinised, with a view to questioning the overall effectiveness of the OFSTED inspection report as an instrument for school improvement.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.