Abstract

Roads alleviate congestion, speed up traffic and lower CO2 in the intensive margin. This attracts more car-trips in the extensive margin. The combined effect often increases fuel used and CO2. How well can public transit offset the higher emissions caused by new roads? In a simple core-periphery model of Beijing, CO2 from road expansion in the periphery is difficult to alleviate by improving transit in the urban core, because (i) choice of car in the core is not elastic enough to bus travel time; (ii) trips are drawn from car to bus, reducing CO2, but trips are also drawn from walking and bicycling to bus, diluting the gains. Reducing core roads or making transit in the periphery faster draws population to the less congested periphery. These policies add to urban sprawl, but offset CO2 from cars more effectively. We show that both policies are more effective in compact cities in which cores are denser or when gasoline prices are much higher.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.