Abstract

To assess the incidence of blood pressure (BP) control and various phenotypes of BP by comparing the results of office and 44-hour ambulatory brachial and central BP measurement in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on program hemodialysis (HD). In 68 patients ESRD receiving renal replacement therapy we evaluated office peridialysis BP and performed 44-hour ambu latory monitoring (ABPM) of brachial and central BP during peridialysis period using a validated oscillometric device BPLabVasotens (OOO "Petr Telegin"). Results were considered statistically significant with p<0.05. The frequency of control of peripheral office BP before the HD session was 25%, after - 23.5%; control of central BP - 48.6% and 49%, respectively. According to office measurement the frequency of systolic-diastolic hypertension was 44.1%, isolated systolic hypertension - 25%, isolated diastolic hypertension - 5.9%. The values of peripheral and central office systolic BP (SBP) before and after HD were not consistent with the corresponding mean and daily SBP levels for 44 hours and for the first and second days of the interdialysis period. The frequency of true uncontrolled arterial hypertension (AH) according to peripheral ABPM was 66.5%, masked uncontrolled AH - 9%. Circadian rhythm abnormalities for 44-h peripheral BP were detected in 77%, for central - in 76%. In 97% of patients agreement between phenotypes of the daily profile of peripheral and central BP was observed. 73% of patients had a significant increase in peripheral and central SBP and pulse pressure (PP) and an increase in the proportion of non-dippers from the 1st to the 2nd day. Patients with ESRD on HD were characterized by poor control of BP control and predominance of unfavourable peripheral and central ambulatory BP phenotypes. A single measurement of clinical peripheral and central BP in the peridialysis period was not sufficient to assess the control of hypertension in this population. The 24-h BP profiles in the 1st and 2nd days of interdialysis period had significant differences.

Highlights

  • Circadian rhythm abnormalities for 44-h peripheral blood pressure (BP) were detected in 77%, for central – in 76%

  • Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on HD were characterized by poor control of BP control and predominance of unfavourable peripheral and central ambulatory BP phenotypes

  • A single measure‐ ment of clinical peripheral and central BP in the peridialysis period was not sufficient to assess the control of hypertension in this popula‐ tion

Read more

Summary

Summary

Целью исследования явилось изучение частоты различных фенотипов и контроля АД на основании сопоставления параметров клинического и 44‐часового периферического и центрального АД, а также определение согласованности данных методов между собой у пациентов с ТПН на программном ГД. Включали пациентов с ТПН в возрасте от 18 до 80 лет, получающих терапию программным ГД в течение более 3 месяцев на момент включения, подписавших информированное согласие. Клиническое измерение периферического АД проводилось непосредственно перед началом сеанса программного ГД и в течение 10–20 мин после его окончания с использованием валидированного осциллометрического прибора (UA 787, AND, Япония), манжетка которого выбиралась индивидуально для каждого пациента с учетом окружности плеча и надевалась на свободную от артериовенозной фистулы руку. На основании сопоставления данных клинического и амбулаторного периферического и центрального АД выделяли следующие фенотипы: истинная контролируемая АГ – нормальные значения. Классификация суточных индексов в зависимости от степени снижения АД в плечевой артерии [21]

Эритропоэтин Препараты железа
До сеанса ГД
Ночные часы
САД ДАД
Центральное АД
Findings
До ГД
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call