Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Does Not Confer Superior Outcomes Among Frail Patients

Abstract

Off-pump coronary revascularization (OPCAB) has been proposed to benefit patients who are at a greater surgical risk because it avoids the use of extracorporeal circulation. Although, historically, older patients were considered high-risk candidates, recent studies implicate frailty as a more comprehensive measure of perioperative fitness. Yet, the outcomes of OPCAB in frail patients have not been elucidated. Thus, using a national cohort of frail patients, we assessed the impact of OPCAB relative to on-pump coronary revascularization (ONCAB). Patients who underwent first-time elective coronary revascularization were tabulated from the 2010 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Frailty was assessed using the previously-validated Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups indicator. Multivariable models were used to consider the independent associations between OPCAB and the key outcomes. Of ∼26,529 frail patients, 6,322 (23.8%) underwent OPCAB. After risk adjustment and compared with ONCAB, OPCAB was linked with similar odds of in-hospital mortality but greater likelihood of postoperative cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.53, confidence interval [CI] 1.13 to 2.07) and myocardial infarction (AOR 1.44, CI 1.23 to 1.69). OPCAB was further associated with greater odds of postoperative infection (AOR 1.22, CI 1.02 to 1.47) but decreased need for blood transfusion (AOR 0.68, CI 0.60 to 0.77). In addition, OPCAB faced a +0.86-day increase in length of stay (CI 0.21 to 1.51) but similar costs (β $1,610, CI -$1,240 to 4,460) relative to ONCAB. Although OPCAB was associated with no difference in mortality compared with ONCAB, it was linked with greater likelihood of postoperative cardiac arrest and myocardial infarction. Our findings demonstrate that ONCAB remains associated with superior outcomes, even in the growing population of frail patients who underwent coronary revascularization.