Off Pump CABG Improves Postoperative Incidence of Coagulopathy Compared with CABG on Pump

Abstract

Abstract Background Coronary artery bypass grafting remains the standard treatment for patients with extensive coronary artery disease. Coronary surgery without use of cardiopulmonary bypass avoids the deleterious systemic inflammatory effects of the extracorporeal circuit. However there is an ongoing debate surrounding the clinical outcomes after on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB versus OPCAB) grafting surgery. Aim of the Work To compare the incidence of postoperative coagulopathy transfusion of blood product therapy, (Packed RBCs, FFP and platelet concentrate) bleeding (amount of blood in chest tube drains) and reexploration, that occur in adults off pump CABG surgery in comparison to on pump CABG. Patients and Methods We enrolled sixty consecutive adult patients scheduled for isolated CABG surgery (with a median sternotomy) with or without cardiopulmonary bypass pump. The patients are allocated in two groups where thirty patients in each group (group A – On pump – ONCAB- conventional surgery) and (group B – Off pump – OPCAB – beating heart) after obtaining their written informed consent. Results The clinical outcome measure was the incidence of bleeding in group B less than group A. In our study there was highly significant increase in the amount of blood in drains, transfusion requirements and need for re-exploration within twenty four hours after surgery in group A than group B. Conclusion We concluded that off pump cardiac surgery is better than on pump procedure in decreasing risk of bleeding, post-operative transfusion requirements and risk of re-exploration.