Abstract

AbstractThis article contends that there was not simply a revival, but a redesign of radicalism during the first decade of the nineteenth century, and that John Cartwright was instrumental in this redirection of reform activity. It argues that this redesign of the reform campaign was a strategic response to the failures of radicalism during the 1790s and, moreover, to changes in high politics after 1801. Against the backdrop of a protracted war and the emergence of a formal Whig opposition, Cartwright, with assistance from other radicals, attempted to create a parliamentary party in support of taxpayer franchise reform and born of a union between metropolitan radicals ‘in doors’, Whig moderate reformers, Foxites and abolitionists. In order to achieve this union, he set aside the popular political campaigning of the 1790s, and instead focused attention on parliamentarians and the select few who might influence parliament. Above all, he highlighted current examples of ministerial dishonesty and mismanagement to generate parliamentary support for a redefined programme of reform, arguing that if corruption were not checked by constitutional reform, then Britain's ability to resist foreign invasion and sustain the war effort would be seriously compromised.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.