Abstract
Someone is influenced easily. It is both merit and demerit of the concerned person simultaneously. A stranger comes and says something. The person believes it. He is influenced first time. Then a second stranger comes. He says the opposite thing. The person also believes it. Thus he is influenced second time. Now the outcome of the decision of the concerned person is quiet unpredictable. Even the person knows it not. He has no locusstandi at all. Here lies the vacillating character of the influence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
