ODP465 BRAF V600 and NRAS Q61 mutations in thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with indeterminate cytology in Argentina

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Abstract It is known that thyroid cancer initiation and progression occurs because of gradual accumulation of genetic and epigenetic alterations at cell level. Many mutations associated with this disease have been reported to be present in genes encoding proteins in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, specifically BRAF and RAS genes, as well as in the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, among others. In particular, molecular alterations in follicular cells in the BRAF or NRAS genes have been reported to be associated with the process of carcinogenesis. Previously we found BRAF and NRAS mutations are observed in a significant number of papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas in our population, respectively. In this study, we tested the diagnostic performance of BRAF and NRAS mutation in thyroid carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens with indeterminate cytology. In total, residual material from 73 FNA samples was used (n= 16, Bethesda III; n=48, Bethesda IV and n=9 Bethesda V). BRAF codon 600 mutation and NRAS codon 61 mutations were investigated using qPCR and melting curve analysis was carried out. Diagnosis of malignancy was confirmed by histology on paired surgical specimen in 54 cases. Results In the cytologically indeterminate categories, 9.6% of specimens were BRAF V600 mutated: 1 of 16 were subcategorized as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (6.3%); 2 of 48 as follicular neoplasm or suspicious for follicular neoplasm (4.1%); and 4 of 9 as suspicious for malignancy (44.4%). NRAS Q61 mutation was found in 4 patients (2 with Bethesda IV and 2 with cytology V). The BRAF V600 mutations were associated with carcinoma in 100% of cases (n = 7), whereas only 75% (n = 3) of the nodules with NRAS were associated with carcinoma. BRAF V600 and NRAS Q61 mutations had high specificity in predicting malignant carcinoma (96.8%); the sensitivity was 43.5% with a positive predictive value of 90.9% and a negative predictive value of 69.8%. In specific categories of indeterminate cytology, the pre-test risk of malignancy was 38%, 33% and 88% while the post molecular test risk of malignancy was 100%, 75% and 100% respectively. Conclusions BRAF V600 and NRAS Q61 molecular test in residual FNA samples improve diagnostic accuracy of the cytology analysis in our population and may help to better select patients for avoid inadequate or unnecessary surgeries. Presentation: No date and time listed