Odor emission measurements: The role of n-butanol as a reference material and origins of large inter-laboratory variability

Abstract

Malodors negatively impact the quality of life of people who are exposed to them. In order to enforce legal emission limit values that aim to reduce these adverse effects, reliable methods for the quantification of odor emissions are needed. The standard EN 13725 describes a method to quantify odor concentration, which is based on the use of human assessors as sensors. Previously published work that studied the performance characteristics of this method indicates that the variability of results between different laboratories is higher than expected and that the uncertainty associated with this method may be underestimated. We analyze here a unique data set, which contains the response of 368 assessors that participated in 21 odor proficiency tests performed in 2016–2022. By investigating the response of the smallest unit of an odor measurement by EN 13725, namely the individual assessor, as opposed to the panel, we gain unprecedented insight into the sources of inter-laboratory variations in odor measurements. Our results indicate that the assessor sensitivity to n-butanol is not transferable to other odorants and odor mixtures, which is contrary to the assumption made in EN 13725. By Monte-Carlo simulation coupled with our data set, we investigate how the responses of individual assessors transfer to panel responses, focusing on the influence of panel size, panel selection strategy and number of rounds. We find that for the laboratories investigated, larger panels only modestly reduce the inter-laboratory variability and we attribute this effect to non-random selection of assessors for the panels of these laboratories. The present work provides new insight into the sources of inter-laboratory variability in odor emission monitoring and is expected to be useful in the further development of reliable methods for odor concentration measurements and odor abatement technology.