Ocular Surface Disease Index© and the five-item dry eye questionnaire: A comparison in Indian patients with dry eye disease.

Abstract

Purpose:To compare the suitability of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and the 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5) in Indian patients with dry eyes.Methods:This cross-sectional study evaluated the OSDI and DEQ-5 in patients with tear film abnormalities. Tear film breakup time, tear film height, Schirmer’s I, lissamine green staining, and meibomian gland expressibility were performed on each patient.Results:There were 101 patients with symptoms and/or signs of tear film abnormality. Both OSDI and DEQ-5 questionnaires significantly correlated (ρ = 0.566, P < 0.0001) with each other. The OSDI questionnaire showed a good correlation with all dry eye tests, whereas the DEQ-5 correlated significantly only with the tear film breakup time and the lissamine green score. None of the questionnaires correlated with meibomian gland expressibility. The Bland–Altman analysis revealed a marginal bias (−0.01 unit) for DEQ-5. The DEQ-5 scored higher in patients with mild symptoms. While 101 (100%) patients answered all the questions in the DEQ-5, only 19 (18.8%) patients answered all the questions in the OSDI questionnaire. The least responses were recorded in the vision-function-related and environmental trigger subscales of the OSDI.Conclusion:The OSDI and DEQ-5 scores showed a moderate correlation. The OSDI questionnaire correlated with a higher number of dry eye tests than the DEQ-5. The large number of skipped questions in the vision-function-related and environmental trigger subscales of the OSDI suggests that the questionnaire is not adequately adapted to the Indian population. Patients with a negative OSDI score should be reassessed with the DEQ-5 to exclude symptom positivity.