Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the safety of agents that systemically inhibit epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRi) in oncologic patients in terms of toxicity to the ocular surface. We performed a prospective clinical study comparing the ocular surface toxicity of systemic EGFRi between a case and a control group. Patients with lung or colon cancer were divided in two groups: 25 patients treated with systemic EGFRi and 25 control patients without EGFRi treatment. Patients in both groups were chemotherapy naive. Four visits were scheduled in a one year period comparing signs and symptoms in terms of symptom questionnaires (SIDEQ, OSDI and AVS), corneal fluorescein staining (Oxford test), tear production (Schirmer's test) and a quantitative evaluation of conjunctival chemosis and hyperemia. Basal epithelial cell density (CEBD) and corneal subepithelial nerve fiber density (CNFD) were measured and compared using confocal microscopy (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany). The differences in each variable were compared with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). A P value<0.05 was considered significant for all comparisons. No statistically significant differences were found between patients under EGFRi treatment and the age-matched controls in the variables analyzed. When cases and controls were evaluated separately, the case group showed a significantly worse progression of signs (chemosis score, CFS, Schirmer's) as well as in terms of CEBD and CNFD (all P<0.05). Systemic EGFRi may increase dry eye signs as well as decrease CEBD and CNFD. This study may help us to understand the true toxicity of EGFRi to the ocular surface.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.