Abstract

ABSTRACT
 Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical utility and cost of the respiratory virus panel test in the febrile neutropenia (FN) episode in children undergoing chemotherapy.
 Material and Method: From 2014 to 2018, 180 episodes of FN in 93 children with cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into those with (Group A) and without respiratory virus panel (Group B). The demographic and clinical features and cost analysis of the groups A and B were noted.
 Results: Of these FN episodes, 46 were in Group A (25.5%) and 134 were in Group B (74.5%). We found positivity in 45 (97.8%) of 46 episodes in Group A. While modification was required in 14 FN episodes (30.4%) in Group A, modification was required in 35 FN episodes (26.1%) in group B. The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.570). In Group A, only 5 (10.8%) were modified according to the respiratory virus panel. The respiratory virus panel prices were $72.43 (interquartile range, $38.8). The ratio of respiratory virus panel cost to the total cost was 9.67% (interquartile range 11.6). The median total cost of group A was $663.18 (interquartile range, 850.1), while that of group B was $596.24 (interquartile range, 723.81). The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.141).
 Conclusion: The respiratory virus panel may contribute to the preference of antibiotics by giving rapid results in FN attacks. However, no effect on modification rates was observed, and only a small percentage of patients underwent antibiotic modification according to respiratory virus panel.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.