Abstract

Observed vertical sediment accumulation rates (n = 1031) were gathered from ~ 55 years of peer reviewed literature. Original methods of rate calculation include long-term isotope geochronology (14C, 210Pb, and 137Cs), pollen analysis, horizon markers, and box coring. These observations are used to create a database of global, contemporary vertical sediment accumulation rates. Rates were converted to cm year−1, paired with the observation’s longitude and latitude, and placed into a machine learning–based Global Predictive Seabed Model (GPSM). GPSM finds correlations between the data and established global “predictors” (quantities known or estimable everywhere, e.g., distance from coastline and river mouths). The result, using a k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) algorithm, is a 5-arc-minute global map of predicted benthic vertical sediment accumulation rates. The map generated provides a global reference for vertical sedimentation from coastal to abyssal depths. Areas of highest sedimentation, ~ 3–8 cm year−1, are generally river mouth proximal coastal zones draining relatively large areas with high maximum elevations and with wide, shallow continental shelves (e.g., the Gulf of Mexico and the Amazon Delta), with rates falling exponentially towards the deepest parts of the oceans. The exception is Oceania, which displays significant vertical sedimentation over a large area without draining the large drainage basins seen in other regions. Coastal zones with relatively small drainage basins and steep shelves display vertical sedimentation of ~ 1 cm year−1, which is limited to the near shore when compared with shallow, wide margins (e.g., the western coasts of North and South America). Abyssal depth rates are functionally zero at the time scale examined (~ 10−4 cm year−1) and increase one order of magnitude near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and at the Galapagos Triple Junction.

Highlights

  • The properties and distribution of seafloor sediment are controlled primarily by coastal processes that are dynamic, changing in response to both anthropogenic and natural stimuli

  • Biologically derived sediment is only a small percentage of total sediment settling on the ocean floor, ~ 160 Mt year−1 (Hedges and Keil 1995; Smith et al 2015) compared with ~ 13,500–19,100 Mt year−1 of fluvial sediment flux to the oceans calculated by Milliman and Meade (1983) and Milliman and Farnsworth (2011)

  • It should be noted that the Caribbean and Northeastern USA are not identified as contributing significant fluvial sediment to the oceans, according to Milliman and Farnsworth (2011); yet there is evidence of increased fluvial sediment discharge as a result of the twentieth century deforestation and urban development of the Caribbean islands (Alonso-Hernandez et al 2006)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The properties and distribution of seafloor sediment are controlled primarily by coastal processes that are dynamic, changing in response to both anthropogenic and natural stimuli. Researchers must implement a suite of physical tests to analyze sediment characteristics and behavior, including coring, radioisotope-based sedimentation rate calculations, grain size analysis, loss-on-ignition tests, and density analysis (e.g., Nittrouer and Sternberg 1981; Richardson et al 2002; Keller et al 2017; Restreppo et al 2019). These tests require in situ sample collection, intensive subsampling, and prolonged laboratory analysis to assemble a usable data set. A less regionally focused, more expedient method is needed for global scale sediment characterization

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call