Abstract

To date, there is a paucity of literature offering practicing urologists a reference for the amount of radiation exposure received while surgically managing urolithiasis. This study examines the cumulative radiation exposure of an urologist over 9 months. We present a case series of fluoroscopic exposures of an experienced stone surgeon operating at an academic comprehensive stone center between April and December 2011. Radiation exposure measurements were determined by a thermoluminescent dosimeter worn on the outside of the surgeon's thyroid shield. Estimations of radiation exposure (mrem) per month were charted with fluoroscopy times, using scatter plots to estimate Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. The total 9-month radiation exposure was 87 mrems for deep dose equivalent (DDE), 293 mrem for lens dose equivalent (LDE), and 282 mrem for shallow dose equivalent (SDE). Total fluoroscopy time was 252.44 minutes for 64 ureteroscopies (URSs), 29 percutaneous nephrolithtomies (PNLs), 20 cystoscopies with ureteral stent placements, 9 shock wave lithotripsies (SWLs), 9 retrograde pyelograms (RPGs), 2 endoureterotomies, and 1 ureteral balloon dilation. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients examining the association between fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure were not significant for DDE (p = 0.6, Spearman's rho = 0.2), LDE (p = 0.6, Spearman's rho = 0.2), or SDE (p = 0.6, Spearman's rho = 0.2). Over a 9-month period, total radiation exposures were well below annual accepted limits (DDE 5000 mrem, LDE 15,000 mrem and SDE 50,000 mrem). Although fluoroscopy time did not correlate with radiation exposure, future prospective studies can account for co-variates such as patient obesity and urologist distance from radiation source.

Highlights

  • To date, there is a paucity of literature offering practicing urologists a reference for the amount of radiation exposure received while surgically managing urolithiasis

  • This study examines the cumulative radiation exposure of an urologist over 9 months, taking into account radiation exposure for all endourologic procedures [ureteroscopy (URS), shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), cystoscopy, retrograde pyelograms, etc.]

  • Complete fluoroscopy time data was available for 134 procedures; 3 procedures without complete fluoroscopy time data were excluded from analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a paucity of literature offering practicing urologists a reference for the amount of radiation exposure received while surgically managing urolithiasis. This study examines the cumulative radiation exposure of an urologist over 9 months. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients examining the association between fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure were not significant for DDE (p = 0.6, Spearman’s rho = 0.2), LDE (p = 0.6, Spearman’s rho = 0.2), or SDE (p = 0.6, Spearman’s rho = 0.2). Most reports of urologic health care worker radiation exposure risks include data on procedure-specific radiation scatter, i.e., how much radiation scatter occurs during an average ureteroscopy or percutaneous case. The current literature lacks data on long-term radiation exposure that urologists receive for all “general” endourologic cases. This study examines the cumulative radiation exposure of an urologist over 9 months, taking into account radiation exposure for all endourologic procedures [ureteroscopy (URS), shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), cystoscopy, retrograde pyelograms, etc.]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call