Abstract

The role of epidemiological and animal experimental studies in the process of qualitative and quantitative risk assessment is discussed. So far little agreement exists between animal experimental data and epidemiological outcomes in the procedure of qualitative risk assessment. Several reasons for these discrepancies are mentioned. The application of existing epidemiological study results in quantitative risk assessment is hampered by factors, such as the lack of exact exposure information (compound, level, duration), undefined other exposures in and outside the working environment, small sample sizes, the comparatively short duration of epidemiological studies and the absence of detailed information about the specific effects. All this resulted in a relatively small impact of epidemiological studies in risk assessment. Recommendations are made in order to improve the impact of epidemiology in risk assessment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.