Abstract

Objective. To quantify effects on occlusion and temporomandibular function of mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures in shortened dental arches. Methods. Subjects wearing mandibular extension removable partial dentures (n = 25) were compared with subjects with shortened dental arches without extension (n = 74) and with subjects who had worn a mandibular extension removable partial denture in the past (n = 19). Subjects with complete dentitions (n = 72) were controls. Data were collected at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 9-year observations. Results. Occlusal activity in terms of reported awareness of bruxism and occlusal tooth wear of lower anterior teeth did not differ significantly between the groups. In contrast, occlusal tooth wear of premolars in shortened dental arches with or without extension dentures was significantly higher than in the controls. Differences amongst groups with respect to signs and symptoms related to temporomandibular disorders were not found. Occlusal support of the dentures did not influence anterior spatial relationship. Occlusal contacts of the denture teeth decreased from 70% for second premolars via 50% for first molars, to 30% for second molars. Conclusions. Mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures in moderate shortened dental arches had no effects on occlusion and temporomandibular function.

Highlights

  • Extension of moderate shortened dental arches (3 to 5 posterior occluding units) is still a controversial issue

  • This study aims to investigate whether mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures designed for moderate shortened dental arches are beneficial or not to the patients regarding some clinically relevant parameters on occlusion and temporomandibular function

  • The model showed only one significant effect in the ‘SDA previous RPD’ the period the shortened dental arch existed at baseline had a significant influence on awareness of bruxism (P =.03)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Extension of moderate shortened dental arches (3 to 5 posterior occluding units) is still a controversial issue. The most cited arguments for extending shortened dental arches are improvement of chewing function and rehabilitation of posterior support. Only about 10% of subjects with moderate shortened dental arches reported complaints on chewing function for hard foods [1, 2]. The chewing capacity of subjects with moderate shortened dental arches is approximately halfway this scale [3]. It has been demonstrated that having a moderate shortened dental arch gives no reason for shifts in food selection and does not affect gastrointestinal function dietary [4, 5]. With respect to chewing ability no benefit can be gained from replacing absent teeth unless fewer than three posterior occluding pairs are present [6]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call