Occlusal devices in France: An assessment of professional practice

Abstract

Statement of problemWhether recommendations for the use of occlusal devices are made uniformly in terms of indications, designs, and wearing time is unclear. Different recommendations may lead to different clinical outcomes. PurposeThe purpose of this survey was to assess the professional practice of dental surgeons in France regarding the use of occlusal devices. Material and methodsA 26-question cross-sectional survey was sent to a panel of French dentists via the County Councils of the Dental Order. The questionnaire concerned the amount of occlusion-related treatment, the use of an anterior deprogramming device, stabilization splint, and anterior repositioning appliance, and the patient follow-up as well as the drawbacks of using an occlusal device as a therapeutic solution. The statistical tests used in the study were the chi-square test and the Yate correction for continuity. ResultsA total of 771 responses were received. Invasive options were still reported as being used as a first-line treatment for temporomandibular disorder, although a statistical difference was found between experienced and recently graduated practitioners, with recent graduates preferring noninvasive options as first-line treatment. Also, the results showed that anterior deprogramming devices were not used or that their application, particularly the length of treatment, was unfamiliar to practitioners. The anterior repositioning appliance seems to be used, but only a few practitioners integrate it into their practice. In general, about one-third of dentists appear to have a good knowledge of occlusion-related treatments, in particular, the use of occlusal devices. ConclusionsThe results indicated that only 20% to 30% of practitioners have good knowledge of contemporary occlusion-related practice. There is a need for the standardization of practice and improved education for practitioners in the use of occlusal devices.