OC62 REDO MITRAL SURGERY AND HOSPITAL OUTCOME: IMPACT OF FAILED MITRAL VALVE REPAIR

Abstract

Background and Aim: Mitral valve repair is the gold standard for mitral valve regurgitation, even if failed mitral repairs (FMR) have been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of FMR on early outcome after redo mitral surgery. Methods: Operative mortality and major morbidity events from 920 redo mitral procedures at nine European centres were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed by the SPSS 13.0 program for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). To identify indipendent predictors of operative deaths, variables with a P < 0.10 at univariable analysis were included in the regression models. All the outcome parameters were then adjusted by propensity matching, to compare similar cohorts of patients with FMR or diseased native mitral valves and similar cohorts of patients with FMR and malfunctioning prostheses. Results: FMR did not impact mortality at multivariable analysis (P = 0.64). Propensity-matched cohorts of FMR and native mitral valves showed no differences in mortality (P = 0.69). A preoperative Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease score >2 chronic lung disease (COPD) (OR 15.2, P < 0.01), left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (odds ratio (OR) 21.5, P = 0.005), major injury to cardiovascular structures at re-entry (OR 27.2, P < 0.01) or to patent left internal mammary artery-coronary artery bypass graft (OR 7.6, P = 0.03) predicted mortality in the FMR population. Conclusions: A failed mitral repair does not impact hospital outcome of redo surgery. Severe left ventricular dysfunction, COPD and injury at re-entry predict adverse early outcome.