Abstract

Radiologists provided diagnosis of parametrial infiltration at MR for the same sections. Infiltration was classified as Grade 1 or ‘‘incipient’’(the tumor infiltrates the pericervical fascia) and Grade 2–3 or ‘‘evident’’(the infiltration progresses through the fascia to the parametrium). Concordance between 2D-US, 3D-US, and MR results was assessed. Results: Agreement between 2D-US, 3D-US, and MRI was 65%. Agreement between MR and 2D-US was 76%; agreement between 3D-US and MR was 79%. In all discordant cases with no parametrial infiltration at MR, Grade 1 infiltration was diagnosed at 3D-US; in no case 3D-US underestimated MR results. When considering agreement between 3D-US and MR for each section, the best concordance was achieved in intermediate space (76%), and the worst in caudal space (34.5%). Conclusions: Off-line analysis of 3D-US seems to be an accurate diagnostic tool in assessment of parametrial infiltration, with comparable results to MR in all cases with evident infiltration. Dynamic evaluation at 2D-US, and a continuous scrolling through the cervix at 3D-US off-line analysis represent two advantages of US examination.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call