Abstract

Abstract Aim Recording short and long term outcomes of primary ventral hernia (PH) and incisional hernia (IH) surgeries performed in India. Materials and Methods Members of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons (IAGES) were approached via mails and social media. Forty-five centres agreed to participate. The participating surgeons prospectively recorded the data of patients who underwent VHR from January 21, 2021- April 20, 2021, on a predesigned excel sheet. They were followed for 6 months. Results Data from 648 patients were analysed in this study for demographics, hernia characteristics, technical variations, and outcomes. 375 (57.8%) were primary ventral hernias (PH) and 273 (42.15%) were incisional hernias (IH), of which 63 (9.7%) were recurrent hernias. In the PH group, 171 patients underwent minimal access repair (MAS) and 170 patients underwent open repair. The commonest procedure were open onlay and open pre-peritoneal repairs were performed least frequently. There were 3.73% seroma, 3.2% SSI, 0% 90-day readmission, 0% recurrence, and 0.3% mortality. In the IH group, 164 patients underwent open repair and 104 underwent MAS repair. The most commonly performed procedure were open onlay and IPOM/IPOM plus. There were 13.92% seroma, 4.4% hematoma, 9.5% SSI, 1.1% mesh explantation, 0.4% wound sinus, 2.2% 90-day readmission, 0% recurrence, and 1.1% mortality. Conclusion Despite the guidelines favouring sublay repairs, onlay mesh hernioplasty is the commonest procedure practiced in India. IPOM/IPOM plus is the second commonest procedure. TAR is the preferred component separation technique in India. Complication rates in this study are comparable to published world literature.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call