OC-041 TOTALLY EXTRA-PERITONEAL REPAIR VERSUS TRANS-ABDOMINAL PRE-PERITONEAL REPAIR FOR THE LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF SPORTSMAN'S HERNIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Abstract

Abstract Aim Open and laparoscopic modalities are employed for treatment of sportsman's hernia, with totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) and trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic approaches both currently being utilised. At present, neither subtype has demonstrated superiority for sportsman's hernia repair. The aim of this review was to evaluate current evidence to ascertain whether there was a difference in laparoscopic techniques following sportsman's hernia repair. Material & Methods A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards. Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale for RCTs and observational studies, respectively. The assessed outcomes included median time to return to sporting activity, complications and the degree of postoperative pain reduction within three months. Random effects model was used to calculate pooled proportion data where feasible. Subgroup analyses were also performed. Results 28 studies were identified including 2 RCTs and 26 observational studies. No significant differences were observed between techniques in the primary or secondary outcomes. Significant heterogeneity was observed in all outcomes. This was signficant for return to sporting activity; thus meta-analysis was not feasible in this domain. Median time to return to sporting activity was 28 days for both techniques. Conclusions There is no difference in the primary and secondary outcomes in either technique. An RCT comparing TEP and TAPP repair is needed to provide definitive data.